
Last week we looked a little at the Book of Enoch (BOE) and what it is. This week, I’d like to clarify a few things about the book itself, and then we’ll look at whether it is genuine and inspired: should it be included in the Canon of Scripture?
Nearly all Enochian scholars agree the book is not genuine, it is not what it presents itself to be: a book written by Enoch, the seventh from Adam. Nearly all scholars believe the book is a compilation of several authors. The “Book of Enoch,” is the common name for “The First Book of Enoch” (there are three) or the “Ethiopic Enoch.”
First, we need to understand the BOE is simply an old (200 b.c. to 100 a.d.) book of Jewish religious writings. We have partial manuscripts of the book found among the Dead Sea Scrolls in the Qumran community, but no complete manuscript of all 108 chapters. The earliest complete manuscript that exists is dated about the 15th century.
It is mostly written in apocalyptic symbolic language and therefore can be interpreted in many ways. The book itself is divided into five sections:
Book of the Watchers 1–36 Strongly apocalyptic: angels, heavenly journeys, judgment
Book of Parables 37–71 Apocalyptic visions and symbolic descriptions of the coming judge
Astronomical Book 72–82 Astronomical descriptions and revelations about heavenly order
Book of Dream Visions 83–90 Symbolic dreams, animals representing people and nations, history and judgment
Epistle of Enoch 91–108 Ethical exhortations, wisdom sayings, warnings, and apocalyptic prophecy
Though eleven manuscripts were found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, more than forty have been found elsewhere: in Egypt, Ethiopia, and the Vatican Library. The original is believed to have been written in Aramaic, and only those found at Qumran are in Aramaic. Others are in Greek, Coptic, Syriac, but these are small fragments or merely quotations of the BOE. The largest number of manuscripts and most important to scholars are in Ge’ez, an ancient Ethiopic language. There are 40 of these of which at least five are complete. These 40 are dated 15th to 17th centuries. Two Orthodox sects include the BOE in their Canon: The Ethiopian and Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo churches totaling about 60 million followers.
The Protestant Canon has four major tests for inspiration:
1. Does the book have apostolic or prophetic origin? The BOE does not. It is not what it presents itself to be.
2. Agreement with previously recognized revelation? There are some disagreements between the BOE and Old Testament books – BOE chapter 22 gives a contrary view of what happens to the dead than Jesus gave. So, no.
3. Reception by God’s people and the early churches. The Qumran community certainly saw the POE as important. There were even commentaries on the BOE found. So, I’ll give this a “Maybe.”
4. Recognition as authoritative Scripture. While there were a few in the early church that wanted this book included in the Canon – Tertullian and the writer of the Epistle of Barnabas are named. Others said they respected it but did not want to include it in the Canon. Given the very few in favor, I’ll give this point a No.
Why is this important?
Once again, the BOE is an interesting piece of early Jewish writing which gives opinions on things like Genesis 6:1-4, about the angels perhaps marrying human women. The issue is that this is Jewish tradition, not scriptural evidence. It is the opinion of the writer(s) as to how some portions of Scripture might be interpreted.
There is much more to the BOE, but it is the portions related to scriptural interpretation which seems to be of the greatest interest in the church. Scripture is the standard by which we must judge all things. It is when we drift from Scripture in favor of “some new thing” that we lose our way. Read the BOE with interest but not with the expectation of enlightenment.









