believersarmedanddangerous

The Christian and His Wealth

The Christian and His Wealth

Job 31:24-28 (ESV) “If I have made gold my trust

or called fine gold my confidence,

²⁵ if I have rejoiced because my wealth was abundant

or because my hand had found much,

²⁶ if I have looked at the sun when it shone,

or the moon moving in splendor,

²⁷ and my heart has been secretly enticed,

and my mouth has kissed my hand,

²⁸ this also would be an iniquity to be punished by the judges,

for I would have been false to God above.

Mark 10:23 (ESV) And Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, “How difficult it will be for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!”

So, what are Christians to do with wealth or even more than they need? I think the Bible tells us there are three categories where our money should go:

My personal belief and budgeting practice has been that my first check for 10% goes to God. I get this from Luke 11:42 (ESV) “But woe to you Pharisees! For you tithe mint and rue and every herb, and neglect justice and the love of God. These you ought to have done, without neglecting the others.”

That is our tithe. Anything over that is an additional offering to God for a particular need He has shown us.

So, first I give to the God Who has provided this money. I’d like to say here if you are truly not able to do this, until you can, giving what you can afford and tithing your time in His work is a practice I believe God will honor.

Secondly, I’m required to provide for my family’s direct needs: 1 Tim. 5:8 (ESV) But if anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for members of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.

Our family’s needs are paramount and honorable. Someone who works to put food on the family table and a roof over the family’s heads, to clothe them and warm them, no matter what their job might be, is a hero in my book and has fulfilled the requirements God has given him/her. I had a friend that literally scraped the slime from the gutters of the streets of our town in order to provide for his wife and two young children. He was an honorable man in God’s eyes.

My third category is others. Yes, our obligation even reaches others in need. We see this in a quote from Job in the same chapter as above, verses 16-23 (ESV):

¹⁶ “If I have withheld anything that the poor desired,

or have caused the eyes of the widow to fail,

¹⁷ or have eaten my morsel alone,

and the fatherless has not eaten of it

¹⁸ (for from my youth the fatherless grew up with me as with a father,

and from my mother’s womb I guided the widow),

¹⁹ if I have seen anyone perish for lack of clothing,

or the needy without covering,

²⁰ if his body has not blessed me,

and if he was not warmed with the fleece of my sheep,

²¹ if I have raised my hand against the fatherless,

because I saw my help in the gate,

²² then let my shoulder blade fall from my shoulder,

and let my arm be broken from its socket.

²³ For I was in terror of calamity from God,

and I could not have faced his majesty.

Why is this important?

God has given us money for a reason. It can be earned or given. Either way, it is a blessing, and we are to be good stewards of what He has given. Some of us don’t do this. We are unwise with what we have. The Bible speaks against greed, against holding back the money God has given and not using it as God wills.

In the U.S. God has often given us more than enough for all of the above. It is at our discretion how this is to be used. Yes, we can use some of the “surplus” for relaxation, for refreshing our spirits, for things so long as those don’t become the center of our lives, the idols we worship rather than Jehovah Jireh, the God who will provide. God will bless a good steward. Prov. 3:9-10 (ESV)

Honor the Lord with your wealth and with the firstfruits of all your produce; then your barns will be filled with plenty, and your vats will be bursting with wine.

What if the Bible Never Existed?

2 Tim. 3:16-17 (ESV) All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, ¹⁷that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.

So, by what Paul says here, Scripture is our source for teaching, reproof, correction, and training in righteousness. What do people do who either don’t have the Bible or have rejected the Bible as uninspired?

In their book, An Introduction to Christian Philosophical Theology, Davis and Yang give four probable outcomes of a society without the Bible should they wish to understand salvation and how to arrive at salvation without Scripture:

“Legalism: A religious system that consists only of a set of rules that must be stringently followed.

“Ritualism: A religious system that prescribes ceremonial practices, perhaps to placate the gods or to engage in a trade in goods or services – for example, sacrifices for plenty of rain and crops.

“Relativism: The view that no particular set of beliefs or practices is correct or privileged – as long as you are sincere in what you believe and how you live, you are doing well.

“Nihilism: There is no answer to the question or no way of knowing the answer, so there is no hope of salvation – it is merely wishful thinking.” (Davis and Yang, p. 29-30)

As most of you know, there are two divine sources for information about God: creation and the Bible. These are called general revelation and special revelation respectively. We can learn a lot about God through His creation: God is orderly, creative, logical, caring, greater than the universe He created, and so on. It is our dependence on God’s Word which teaches us about God’s chosen people, their interaction with Him throughout their history, and, of course, the sacrificial death, burial, and resurrection of His Son in order that we might be offered eternal life.

Special revelation is not necessarily Scripture, though. It can also be dreams, visions, any sort of direct communication from God to man. Of course, these communications must be compared with the Scriptures themselves and discarded if they do not align.

We do seem to have evidence of some direct divine contact with men as long ago as perhaps 3000 b.c. Some of the names found in the ruins of Ebla, a city which thrived between 3000 and 2000 b.c., contain the name Ya, perhaps Yahweh. Names such as mi-ka-ya (“Who is like Yah”) and ish-ma-ya (“Yah has heard”) were found on tablets in the ancient city and may point to a public knowledge of Yahweh. The abbreviation of God’s name, “Yah,” is used throughout the Bible in the term “Hallelujah” where the “j” is pronounced as a “y.”

This might indicate God had contacted us through some sort of special revelation prior to Moses in order to guide men in righteousness even then. It could also have been passed down to their descendants by Adam and Eve through word of mouth.

Why is this important?

We see the need for some sort of contact whether written, as in the case of the Bible, or some sort of direct communication from God in the form of dreams or visions, for us not to wander off into some of the errors listed above by Davis and Yang. Scripture is the standard, the one true and reliable source for our knowledge of God and His will in our lives. It tells us specifically what God has done for us and how we please Him through obedience and displease Him through sin.

If there were no Bible, so much of what we know of God and of ourselves might never been realized.

The Woman Caught in Adultery

John 8:1-11 (NASB) But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. 2 And early in the morning He came again into the temple, and all the people were coming to Him; and He sat down and began to teach them. 3 And the scribes and the Pharisees *brought a woman caught in adultery, and having set her in the midst, 4 they *said to Him, “Teacher, this woman has been caught in adultery, in the very act. 5 “Now in the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women; what then do You say?” 6 And they were saying this, testing Him, in order that they might have grounds for accusing Him. But Jesus stooped down, and with His finger wrote on the ground. 7 But when they persisted in asking Him, He straightened up, and said to them, “He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.” 8 And again He stooped down, and wrote on the ground. 9 And when they heard it, they began to go out one by one, beginning with the older ones, and He was left alone, and the woman, where she was, in the midst. 10 And straightening up, Jesus said to her, “Woman, where are they? Did no one condemn you?” 11 And she said, “No one, Lord.” And Jesus said, “Neither do I condemn you; go your way. From now on sin no more.”

This story of the woman caught in adultery is an interesting passage of Scripture as are all passages of Scripture. This one is disputed as to whether it is actually Scripture, though. The story doesn’t appear in the earliest manuscripts of the New Testament but is possibly referred to by the Church Father, Papias (60 – 130 a.d.). Since it doesn’t appear in a New Testament Manuscript until the fifth century, many scholars believe it was not included in the original text. Greek Scholar, F. F. Bruce, doesn’t even include it in his commentary on the Gospel of John because of this belief.

Other scholars believe it appeared in the original autographs but was removed because the early church thought it treated adultery less severely than it should. Adultery was apparently a problem in the early church perhaps due to the Roman and Greek culture of having a wife and a mistress.

A third camp believes this is a not Scripture but is a true historical event in which Jesus did address the adulterous woman and her Pharisee accusers. They believe this because the story appears in early extrabiblical writings such as Papias (60-130 a.d.), Didascalia Apostolorum (c. 230 a.d.), Ambrose of Milan (c. 340-397 a.d.), and Augustine (354-439). It also appears in the Latin Vulgate translated in the late fourth Century. The earliest it appears in a New Testament manuscript is in one of our earliest full version of the New Testament, Codex Bezae (c. 400 a.d.) and Codex Washingtonianus dated about the same time and contains most of the four gospels.

The story doesn’t always appear in John chapter eight either. Sometimes it appears in chapter 21 and even in Luke. Again, this leads some to think either it was removed and copiests didn’t know where to reinsert the story, or it was a non-biblical but actual historical event which some copiests wanted to include in the gospel.

I’m going to take the view it is Scripture until proven otherwise. Now let’s look a little at the text. There are some fascinating points to make here.

In verses six and eight, Jesus writes in the dirt. This is the only place in the New Testament where Jesus writes anything. In Exodus 31:18, God (YHWH) uses His finger to write His Law in stone: (NASB) And when He had finished speaking with him upon Mount Sinai, He gave Moses the two tablets of the testimony, tablets of stone, written by the finger of God.

Leviticus 20:10 says the Pharisees in our story should have brought the man who was committing adultery as well, and they were both to be stoned: (NASB) “If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.”

According to Deut. 17:7, the witnesses to the offense were to be the first to cast the stones:

(ESV) The hand of the witnesses shall be first against him to put him to death, and afterward the hand of all the people. So you shall purge the evil from your midst.

So, legally, there was no one to pass judgment on the adulteress. Her accusers had left. Remember she was still under the Law. Jesus had not died and risen yet to bring on the New Testament Age. And, there was to be no divine judgment either since Jesus did not condemn her.

On a lighter note, the last sentence in the passage, “From now on sin no more,” bothered me. I asked Jesus several times in prayer why He would say that. The woman was born with a sin nature just as you and I were. She was going to sin again, maybe not commit adultery again, but she would sin.

I sometimes think my questions are Jesus’ current main source of laughter. He finally told me “Did you expect Me to say, ‘sin no more, and please cut back on the adultery?’” I got the point. Absolute holiness is our goal, and we can only achieve that through God’s forgiveness.

Why is this important?

We receive criticism from all sides as Christians. Many of these criticisms are directed at the reliability of Scripture. Some will say we have included disputed passages in our Bibles, and we need to have an answer for them. This is one.

Is Jesus Good?

Mark 10:17-18 (ESV) And as he was setting out on his journey, a man ran up and knelt before him and asked him, “Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” ¹⁸And Jesus said to him, “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.”

The question, “Is Jesus good?” seems pretty elementary. Of course Jesus is good, but the question has some application to the above verse. Some would say Jesus is denying His deity here, but is He? If we see Jesus is good, then the question He asks is whether the man who knelt before Him recognized who Jesus truly was: God the Son. At the same time, it would be an admission of deity, godhood, by Jesus. Let’s see if Jesus is good.

Hebrews 4:15 says Jesus is without sin:

¹⁵For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.

So, Jesus is without sin. If that doesn’t prove He is good, at least He isn’t bad, is He? But does Jesus ever claim directly to be good? Well, in the Gospel of John, He claims to be the good shepherd:

John 10:11 (ESV) I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.

This shows His love for his sheep (followers). That certainly points to His goodness, at least in His role as Shepherd. There is another passage that might demonstrate more clearly just who Jesus is:

Col. 2:8-9 (ESV) See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. ⁹For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily,

This passage in Colossians would seem to present a major logical problem for those who would claim Jesus is denying His deity in Mark 10:17-18. Let’s look at the logic of it: If all the fullness of God dwells bodily in Jesus and God is eternally and infinitely good, then Jesus is eternally and infinitely good. If Jesus is eternally and infinitely good and the only being which is eternally and infinitely good is God, then Jesus is God. (If you’re into standard form categorical syllogisms, I’ve presented this argument in that form at the end of the post).

Why is this important?

I’m sure somewhere in the last couple of sentences, you might have said, “Boy, Mike, you’re sure getting nitpicky.” Well, sometimes we have to get nitpicky with those who can’t see the truth right in front of them. Jehovah’s Witnesses and others believe Mark 10:17-18 shows Jesus is denying that He is God. From what we have seen above, both biblically and logically, it’s obvious this is not what Mark is telling us Jesus is asking.

Going back to Mark 10:17-18, the traveler is simply being asked if he recognizes Jesus as God incarnate: (ESV) And as he was setting out on his journey, a man ran up and knelt before him and asked him, “Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” ¹⁸And Jesus said to him, “Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.”

I agree with the psalmist:

Ps. 34:8 (ESV) Oh, taste and see that the LORD is good!

——————————————

Syllogisms

Premise #1a – In Jesus, all the fullness of deity dwells bodily
Premise #2a – Deity (God) is eternally and infinitely good.
Conclusion #1a – Therefore, Jesus is eternally and infinitely good.

Premise #1b – If Jesus is eternally and infinitely good and
Premise #2b – And the only being which is eternally and infinitely good is God,
Conclusion #1b – Then Jesus is God

Hell

There are four original language words in the Bible translated as the English term hell: Tartaroo (2 Peter 2:4), Sheol (Ps. 16:10), Hades (Matt. 11:23), and Gehenna – (Matt. 5:22)

Tartaroo is the Greek word which appears only in 2 Peter 2:4 in Scripture, however it does appear in Greek mythology as the subterranean abyss where demigods were punished. So, it speaks of punishment and imprisonment.

For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell and committed them to chains of gloomy darkness to be kept until the judgment;

This passage directly relates to the “everlasting” punishment given the fallen angels of Jude 6 (ESV) And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but left their own abode, He has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day;

So, the punishment/imprisonment is everlasting.

Sheol appears 65 times in the Old Testament, often as grave. An example of this appears in Genesis, when Jacob speaks of going down to Joseph’s grave;

Genesis 42:38 (ESV) But he said, “My son shall not go down with you, for his brother is dead, and he is the only one left. If harm should happen to him on the journey that you are to make, you would bring down my gray hairs with sorrow to Sheol.”

However, in Deuteronomy 32:22, the meaning is a little different. In this passage, it wouldn’t make much sense to translate “sheol” as grave, so the translators use the word “hell:”

For a fire is kindled in My anger, and shall burn to the lowest hell; it shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.

Now we see hell is a particular place of everlasting punishment/imprisonment.

Because the word sheol can mean more than one thing and the context is often unclear, the translators of the ESV all but once transliterate it as simply Sheol and let the reader decide on the meaning.

Hades corresponds to sheol in the Old Testament. It appears ten times in the New Testament text, and the ESV, again, transliterates it as hades nine of those times. In the tenth, Matthew 16:18, grave hardly seems to fit:

And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

Gehenna is the Greek word referring to the Valley of Hinnom or the Valley of the Son of Hinnom in the Old testament (2 kings 21:13-14) where Children were “passed through the fire” as a sacrifice to the gods Molech (2 Kings 23:10 ), and Baal (Jeremiah 32:35) and others. It was used by King Josiah as a place where bodies were burned. This points to a link with fire and the death of the wicked.

This would seem to add fire to this everlasting punishment/imprisonment of hell.

Why is this important?

Some might still think the evidence is slim. Maybe a little better picture of what the future of the wicked looks like could come from two other passages which don’t mention hell directly but speaks of punishment for the lost after death. The first is a statement by Jesus in Luke 16:19-31 where the rich man and Lazarus, a poor beggar in life, have died and are in a place I’ll call paradise although it isn’t what I would usually think of as paradise. Jesus described it as such to the thief on the cross (Luke 23:43).

From what Jesus tells us, they have both died and we see Lazarus at Abraham’s side and the rich man in fiery torment. The rich man asks if Lazarus couldn’t dip his finger in water to cool the rich man’s tongue.

To escape the implications, many will discount this as a parable and not a true story, but I disagree for a few reasons. Firstly, Jesus never used proper names in parables while He did here. Secondly, Jesus usually identified parables as such; He didn’t here. Thirdly, even if it were a parable, Jesus never used unrealistic situations or fantasies in His parables. They were always common life experiences.

Another passage which supports eternal punishment for the lost is Jesus’ words recorded in Matt. 25:44-46 (ESV) Then they also will answer, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to you?’ ⁴⁵Then he will answer them, saying, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me.’ ⁴⁶And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”

The Greek word for punishment here is kolasis and isn’t the go-stand-in-the-corner kind of punishment but torment.

So, no matter how we look at it, hell is not a pleasant place to be. Those who go there will be there forever, forever in torment and punishment. As Christians, we alone understand what hell looks like as we’ve been saved from it. We need to grasp this fully as an incentive to share Christ with the lost and save them from this terrible eternal agony.

Jude 22-23 (NKJV) And on some have compassion, making a distinction; ²³but others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire, hating even the garment defiled by the flesh.

Being Refilled

Acts. 4:31 (ESV) And when they had prayed, the place in which they were gathered together was shaken, and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and continued to speak the word of God with boldness.

This passage used to really bother me. These are the disciples including Peter and John who are praying, so they are already filled with the Holy Spirit. Why, then, if they are filled with the Holy Spirit, why would they need to be refilled? Maybe I have an answer now. Let’s look at the word, filled, first.

Filled is used in several ways when it’s used to describing people. We can be filled with wrath (Luke 4:28), filled with fear (Luke 5:26), filled with madness (Luke 6:11). The word can even be used of a group such as in Acts 13:45 where the Jewish leaders were “filled with jealousy” or Acts 19:29 where a city is “filled with confusion.” In each of these passages, we see something, a powerful emotion in these cases, taking over a person or group and affecting their actions. In the same way, being filled with the power of the Holy Spirit should affect our actions, cause us to act in line with God’s will.

When we fill something like, say, a coffee cup with coffee, the coffee replaces the air that was in the cup. When an aircraft carrier floats in the sea, it displaces the water which would normally be there. So, filling doesn’t just add something; it reduces something else. When we are refilled with the Holy Spirit, I believe the Holy Spirit displaces much of what was there: our fleshly nature.

In our Christian life, we are truly filled with the Holy Spirit from the moment of conversion. When we need a particular additional filling or empowering of the Spirit, a sort of shot in the arm of power, we can pray and the Holy Spirit will displace more of our own will or fear. Speaking of a similar passage in Acts 4:8, the Faithlife Study Bible says this: “In Acts, this term seems to denote a special empowering by the Holy Spirit that is in addition to His work of enabling believers to trust God and to live faithfully (e.g., Acts 2:4; 4:31; 9:17; 13:9).

Paul sees this too. In speaking to believers (who already have the Holy Spirit within them, of course), he tells us to be filled with the Holy Spirit:

Eph. 5:18-21 (ESV) And do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit, ¹⁹addressing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody to the Lord with your heart, ²⁰giving thanks always and for everything to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, ²¹submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ.

Interestingly, Paul here compares being filled with the Holy Spirit and being drunk with wine. Instead of being overwhelmed with “spirits,” we should seek to be overcome by the Spirit of God.

Why is this important?

Pastor Chuck Smith of Calvary Chapel in Costa Mesa, California, used to say “If God guides, God provides.” This was often used in a financial sense such as “If God is telling us to purchase the Property on the corner of Fairview and Sunflower, He will provide the funds.” I think this motto also applies to any task God gives us and we need more power from Him to accomplish that task.

In Acts 4:31 above, John and Peter had just been warned not to preach Jesus in the streets of Jerusalem. They had been strongly threatened probably with death (Acts. 5:33), but they were released. A few days later, they were again brought before the council, and Gamaliel stepped in and said if what they were preaching was of God the council shouldn’t stand in their way. So, the Jewish leaders just had them beaten and threatened them again (Acts 5:40)

These were some of the least serious examples of persecution heaped upon the disciples, but because God the Holy Spirit filled them, they actually rejoiced they were worthy to suffer for Jesus’ name and continued to preach no matter the threat or consequences. (Acts. 5:41-42)

Isn’t this the sort of walk we want? Don’t we want God to fill us more strongly at times when we are filled with feelings of inadequacy or fear. The great advantage of being one of God’s children in times like these is the Holy Spirit has made Himself available to displace that inadequacy and/or fear in us. We need only ask Him.

Leadership

I was talking with a Jehovah’s Witness this week about the subject of leadership, elders in particular. His view was that elders “rule” the congregation, and I can see why he believed that. Jehovah’s Witness tend to be an oppressive group. Elders are the law in the local congregation and see their job as bosses of all. This is not the Biblical view, though, and I’d like to look at the Biblical Christian view of leadership in general, and eldership specifically, to see how God has laid out the church as His bride. I think concentrating on eldership will give us a clear guide to how all types of leadership should be exercised in the church.

First let me say the terms Elder, Pastor, Overseer, and Bishop are all interchangeable when applied to the office in the local church. The office of Christian elder is probably a carryover from the Jewish form of government. The elders were judges who sat at the gates of the city and decided legal matters as in the cities of refuge:

Josh 20:4 (ESV) [The man slayer] shall flee to one of these cities and shall stand at the entrance of the gate of the city and explain his case to the elders of that city. Then they shall take him into the city and give him a place, and he shall remain with them.

In the New Testament, the role is a bit different. Remember the Old Testament was based on the Law of Moses, 633 separate laws. The New Testament is based on the grace of God, the law of the spirit of Christ Jesus:

Rom. 8:2 (NASB) For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death [the Law of Moses].

“But what about the Apostle Paul Timothy that elders should rule well?”

1 Tim. 5:17 (NKJV) Let the elders who rule well be counted worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in the word and doctrine.

Even the word rule here expresses care and concern for the flock, not for personal gain or pride. Elders are not to rule as the world does but as Christ’s example demonstrates:

Mark 10:42-45 (CSB) Jesus called them over and said to them, “You know that those who are regarded as rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those in high positions act as tyrants over them. ⁴³But it is not so among you. On the contrary, whoever wants to become great among you will be your servant, ⁴⁴and whoever wants to be first among you will be a slave to all. ⁴⁵For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”

All leadership in the church is to be approached in this manner. As leaders we are not to be the bosses but caretakers: shepherds who watch over the flock with care and love as servants to the flock.

Leaders in cults like Jehovah’s Witnesses can get away with this behavior because they have convinced their followers to leave the organization means severe punishment. They face shunning by all their friends and family within the organization. It’s suffer under the oppression of often prideful elders or suffer the solitude and loneliness of the outcast.

Why is this important?

God has given instruction for leaders in general and elders in particular.

1 Peter 5:1-4 (NIV) To the elders among you, I appeal as a fellow elder, a witness of Christ’s sufferings and one who also will share in the glory to be revealed: ²Be shepherds of God’s flock that is under your care, serving as overseers—not because you must, but because you are willing, as God wants you to be; not greedy for money, but eager to serve; ³not lording it over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock.

Elders are to be mature Christians, not necessarily older members of the congregation but men who know the faith and can defend it against all comers.

Acts 20:28-29 (ESV) Pay careful attention to yourselves and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to care for the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood. ²⁹I know that after my departure fierce wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock.

If we’re in a leadership role today or will be used by God in such a position in the future, we need to remember leaders are to be servants to those we lead just as Christ is the example for us. Worldly leaders are positioned at the top of the pyramid ruling over all below them. Godly leaders are at the bottom of an inverted pyramid serving all those above them.

Mark 9:35 (NKJV) And He sat down, called the twelve, and said to them, “If anyone desires to be first, he shall be last of all and servant of all.”

Tough Questions?

Over the years questions have risen here though the response is so brief, it wouldn’t fill a blog post. They are important enough to those asking the questions that I thought I’d dedicate today’s blog to them. There are more than these, of course, and we’ll probably look at some of those later, but for now, here are the top five:

Is Christianity a religion or a relationship? I often hear people say Christianity isn’t a religion, it’s a relationship. That simply isn’t true. Christianity qualifies completely as a religion. It has a set of doctrines, rituals, and is centered around a divine figure. That’s a definition of a religion. It’s the “Born Again” experience that is a relationship. It requires only that we trust in Jesus for our salvation.

Does an omnipotent God choose or decide? I don’t see how a God Who knows all things including the best “choice” or “decision” before it needs to be made can be said to choose or decide anything. I often will say “the one true God chooses to exist in three divine persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit,” but that is simply because language falls short for describing God and His dealings. God doesn’t choose. He just knows.

How can we trust the Bible when it has been translated again and again, translation after translation after translation? There are really two questions here, I’ll address the second one first: How can we trust the Bible if it is a translation of a translation of a translation? Very few Bibles are translation from another translation. Most are translated directly from copies of the originals in the original languages of Greek and Hebrew. So the premise is faulty. In answer to the first half of the questions, each new translation is fresh, a fresh translation from copies of the originals. A truly accurate translation must be directly from the originals or copies thereof.

Why do we have so many different translations? This is related to the last question. Today there are more than 900 translations of the New Testament into English. Why do you suppose we need so many? There are actually several reasons. First let me say there are some terrible “translations” such as the New World Translation of the Jehovah’s Witnesses which is written to support their views rather than changing their views to follow Scripture. Another reason is anyone can publish a “translation.” But is it a reliable translation? The Twentieth Century New Testament was written by a group of non-scholars seeking a more modern English version than the KJV: nice idea but a terrible translation. Some “Bibles” are not translations at all but paraphrases.

As far as academics are concerned, new translations are needed as we come to better understand the use of the Biblical languages. Sometimes a word is used only once in the Bible, and the context does not give clear enough evidence to understand the word completely. Decades later, scholars may find that word in a secular text that clarifies its meaning. The 1611 a.d. version of the KJV, for instance, famously mentions a unicorn several times because the translators had not see the Hebrew word for wild ox before and so decided to translate it as unicorn. The better we understand biblical languages, the better and more accurate our newer translations can be.

Can we prove scientifically God exists? The question is akin to asking what color the number six is. It’s a category error although it’s a little hard to see at first. Science deals strictly with the physical world. Since God is not physical but metaphysical, He cannot be tested scientifically. The closest we can come to examining God is through philosophy, but even that is not quite the same as the metaphysical. We can show God exists through philosophical arguments such the moral, teleological, cosmological, ontological, and other arguments and from those understand a little of who God is and what sort of being He is. But to say “Show me God” is a metaphysical request not a scientific one.

We can see the effects of God’s work in our universe and in the lives of people around us, but we can’t see God unless He chooses to enter into the physical realm and manifest Himself as He did in the person of Jesus of Nazareth.

Why is this important?

Sometimes it’s good to have a short and concise answer for questions people throw at us. I just thought you might like a few of the answers I’ve found. God bless you all in the coming New Year.

The Man and the Birds

John 14:8, 9 (ESV) Philip said to him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” ⁹Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father.

I posted this at Christmastime two years ago and thought it might become a Christmas tradition for BAAD. Please let me know what you think of the idea:

Broadcaster Paul Harvey used to tell a wonderful story, a parable really, each year on his last broadcast prior to Christmas. I’ve always loved the story and thought it would be fitting to post it this day before Christmas for your pleasure:

The man to whom I’m going to introduce you was not a scrooge, he was a kind decent, mostly good man. Generous to his family, upright in his dealings with other men. But he just didn’t believe all that incarnation stuff which the churches proclaim at Christmas Time. It just didn’t make sense and he was too honest to pretend otherwise. He just couldn’t swallow the Jesus Story, about God coming to Earth as a man.

“I’m truly sorry to distress you,” he told his wife, “but I’m not going with you to church this Christmas Eve.” He said he’d feel like a hypocrite. That he’d much rather just stay at home, but that he would wait up for them. And so he stayed and they went to the midnight service.

Shortly after the family drove away in the car, snow began to fall. He went to the window to watch the flurries getting heavier and heavier and then went back to his fireside chair and began to read his newspaper. Minutes later he was startled by a thudding sound…Then another, and then another. Sort of a thump or a thud…At first he thought someone must be throwing snowballs against his living room window. But when he went to the front door to investigate he found a flock of birds huddled miserably in the snow. They’d been caught in the storm and, in a desperate search for shelter, had tried to fly through his large landscape window.

Well, he couldn’t let the poor creatures lie there and freeze, so he remembered the barn where his children stabled their pony. That would provide a warm shelter, if he could direct the birds to it.

Quickly he put on a coat, galoshes, tramped through the deepening snow to the barn. He opened the doors wide and turned on a light, but the birds did not come in. He figured food would entice them in. So he hurried back to the house, fetched bread crumbs, sprinkled them on the snow, making a trail to the yellow-lighted wide open doorway of the stable. But to his dismay, the birds ignored the bread crumbs, and continued to flap around helplessly in the snow. He tried catching them…He tried shooing them into the barn by walking around them waving his arms…Instead, they scattered in every direction, except into the warm, lighted barn.

And then, he realized that they were afraid of him. To them, he reasoned, I am a strange and terrifying creature. If only I could think of some way to let them know that they can trust me…That I am not trying to hurt them, but to help them. But how? Because any move he made tended to frighten them, confuse them. They just would not follow. They would not be led or shooed because they feared him.

“If only I could be a bird,” he thought to himself, “and mingle with them and speak their language. Then I could tell them not to be afraid. Then I could show them the way to safe, warm…to the safe warm barn. But I would have to be one of them so they could see, and hear and understand.”

At that moment the church bells began to ring. The sound reached his ears above the sounds of the wind. And he stood there listening to the bells – Adeste Fidelis – listening to the bells pealing the glad tidings of Christmas.

And he sank to his knees in the snow.

Who Should We Pray To?

Recently I was engaged in a conversation about who we should pray to. We were talking about the Trinity and how, to some degree, each Person of the one God has particular roles. Only Jesus, for instance, died for our sins, not the Father or the Holy Spirit. This idea led to the question: do we pray to particular Persons for particular things? Let’s look at this:

The Father:

Jesus tells us to pray to the Father: Matt. 6:9 (ESV) Pray then like this: “Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name” This is the “Lord’s Prayer,” of course, and in it Jesus lists some things to pray for: God’s Kingdom to come, God’s will to be done here and in heaven, for our daily needs, for forgiveness, not to be tempted, to be delivered from evil, and give praise to our God.

The Son:

Jesus says something similar, though briefly, about Himself in John 14:14 (ESV) If you ask me anything in my name, I will do it. “Anything” would certainly include the full list of the Lord’s Prayer and then some. So, praying to the Son is as appropriate as prayers to the Father.

The Holy Spirit:

Acts 13:2-3 (ESV) While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” ³Then after fasting and praying they laid their hands on them and sent them off.

This passage doesn’t directly state the disciples’ prayers and worship were directed to the Holy Spirit, but I believe it implies it strongly, especially in verse 3 after the Holy Spirit had answered their prayer and given them direction. So prayer to the Holy Spirit is just as appropriate as to the Father and the Son.

Why is this important?

The title question stems from our misunderstanding of our God, Yahweh, and our place in His care. Our God is one God. God is a gracious God. There is no pride in Him and, therefore, no prideful jealousy. Even if we could get it wrong, God looks at our hearts. He knows what you want to say and listens intently. He is infinite in all of His ways. He’s infinitely benevolent so is anxious to listen and respond to our benefit. He is infinitely knowledgeable to understand all we say and do, so He listens to our mistakes, our stumbling, our uncertainty in prayer and makes sense of those. No matter how great we think God is, He is greater.

We as His children cannot make mistakes in our prayers to this great and gracious God. We can’t pray to the wrong Person. We can’t pray in a wrong way if our heart is pure toward Him. If this is a concern for anyone you know, I suggest you point them to Romans:

Romans 8:26 (ESV) Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness. For we do not know what to pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words.